Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Date | Sun, 05 Jun 2005 10:53:44 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 10:26 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 02:17:12 +0200
:)
> but i think the fundamental question remains even on Sunday mornings - > is the plist overhead worth it? Compared to the simple sorted list we > exchange O(nr_RT_tasks_running) for O(nr_RT_levels_used) [which is in > the 1-100 range], is that a significant practical improvement? By > overhead i dont just mean cycle cost, but also architectural flexibility > and maintainability.
That was my question too.
tglx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |