[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kmalloc without GFP_xxx?
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 14:02 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> Hi,
> It struck me that kernel actually can figure out whether it's okay
> to sleep or not by looking at combination of (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
> and ((in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) as it already does this for
> might_sleep() barfing:

that is not enough.

you could be holding a spinlock for example!

(and no that doesn't set in_atomic() always)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-29 13:20    [W:0.058 / U:2.660 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site