[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: PREEMPT_RT & threading IRQ 0

    * Lee Revell <> wrote:

    > Ingo, what's the status of putting irq 0 back in a thread with
    > PREEMPT_RT? IIRC this had some adverse (maybe unfixable?) effects so
    > it was disabled a few months ago.

    the jury is still out on that one - but right now it seems it's too much
    complexity for a handful of usecs of latency improvement. Especially
    with things like high-resolution timer support, the threading IRQ0
    doesnt seem to be worth it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-29 09:53    [W:0.022 / U:10.784 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site