[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PREEMPT_RT & threading IRQ 0

* Lee Revell <> wrote:

> Ingo, what's the status of putting irq 0 back in a thread with
> PREEMPT_RT? IIRC this had some adverse (maybe unfixable?) effects so
> it was disabled a few months ago.

the jury is still out on that one - but right now it seems it's too much
complexity for a handful of usecs of latency improvement. Especially
with things like high-resolution timer support, the threading IRQ0
doesnt seem to be worth it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-29 09:53    [W:0.058 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site