lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3
    From
    On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:54:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
    > If you were suggesting this to be run on an SMP system, I would agree
    > with you. I, too, would very much like to see these results run on a
    > 2-CPU or 4-CPU system, although I am most certainly -not- asking Kristian
    > and Karim to do this work -- it is very much someone else's turn in the
    > barrel, I would say!

    No, I'm suggesting that you and other folks understand the basic ideas
    behind this patch and stop asking unbelievably stupid questions. This has
    been covered over and over again, and I shouldn't have to repeat these
    positions constantly because folks have both a language comprehension
    problem and inability to bug off appropriately.

    > However, on a UP system, I have to agree with Kristian's choice of
    > configuration. An embedded system developer running on a UP system would
    > naturally use a UP Linux kernel build, so it makes sense to benchmark
    > a UP kernel on a UP system.

    Dual cores are going to be standard in the next few years so RTOSs should
    anticipate these things coming down the pipeline.

    bill

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-30 03:47    [W:6.206 / U:3.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site