Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:28:32 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status |
| |
> > On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 21:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > That said, I don't like the reiser name-number style. If you must do > > > something like this, mark responsibility by using a named identifier > > > covering the layer in question instead. > > > > > > assert("trace_hash-89", is_hashed(foo) != 0); > > > > A human readable message would be nicer. For example, "foo was hashed". > > Indeed.
You can just dump the expression (with #argument). That is what traditional userspace assert did forever.
It won't help for BUG_ON(a || b || c || d || e) but these are bad style anyways and should be avoided.
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |