Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: reiser4 plugins | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:01:30 +0100 |
| |
On Llu, 2005-06-27 at 10:18, Markus Törnqvist wrote: > Sure, "other people merge design-breakers and bugs" is NOT a justification > for merging Reiser4, of course, but Reiser4's track record has vastly > cleaned itself up.
The discussion is about merging from -mm, not into -mm. The merge into -mm isn't at all under discussion so I don't the relevance of the comparison.
> 0. Namesys addresses the code beautification reqs mentioned here earlier. > > 1. Merge Reiser4 sans metas into 2.6.13. > 2. Namesys can have a separate metas patch for testing. > 3. Gradually merge Reiser4 architecture into VFS and if this really > requires a 2.7, as (iirc) Valdis Kletnieks suggested, make it so. > Might do the rest of the kernel some good too.
0 and 1 look like the first right steps to take to me as well. That will allow people to use reiser4 and give it a good hammering see what comes out and how it benches in real life.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |