Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:20:19 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting |
| |
* Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> Thanks. task_curr is what we needed. Would exporting task_curr be ok > or should we continue to wrap in a separate function ?
wrapping a non-exported function and then exporting it is not nice at all (it circumvents the non-exported status of that original function). But we can internal-export (EXPORT_GPL) task_curr() itself.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |