Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:38:19 +0900 | From | Miles Bader <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git |
| |
On 6/23/05, Mike Bell <kernel@mikebell.org> wrote: > Greg gave me an "I assume so" estimate that udev was smaller by excluding > the size of sysfs a while back. If you include sysfs in udev's overhead > then I believe devfs wins handily, but I haven't done the numbers to > prove it so my estimate is no better. I'm just basing it on sysfs being > absolutely huge, in linux-tiny terms.
Is it? I always just sort of assumed that sysfs kernel support would be more or less equivalent in size to devfs kernel support.
-Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |