Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:12:58 -0700 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: reiser4 plugins |
| |
Alan Cox wrote:
> SMP scaling.
Reiser4 should do much better at this, as it was designed for it. I wish we had a nice hunking multiprocessor to verify that and work through the inevitable unintended sources of bottlenecks though.
> > >>You know how many I've had thrashed on Reiser4? Two. The first one was >>with a VERY early alpha/beta, and the second one was when I dropped a >>laptop and the disk failed. >> >> > >Entirely or bad blocks ? The latter should have a minimal cost on a well >designed fs. > > > >>Duplication of effort. With plugins, we can optimize the upper layers >>of ALL filesystems, regardless of the lower layers, in such a way that >> >> > >In which case the features belong in the VFS as all those with >experience and kernel contributions have been arguing. > > So you fundamentally reject the prototype it in one fs and then abstract it to others development model?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |