Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:55:38 -0700 | Subject | Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2 | From | Bill Huey (hui) <> |
| |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 08:47:25PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > FWIW, Opersys has no engineering cycles to spare. This current > testset and all related human and hardware costs are actually > coming straight out of my personal pocket. I have no client paying > for this. And, FWIW, I had absolutely no idea what we were going > to find when I started this. Certainly I didn't expect that
What you found with this is the very limit of your patience :)
> preempt_rt would be able to do as good as the ipipe in terms of > interrupt latency, and that's to your credit.
...
> After all, showing how much of a fraud we are shouldn't be that > difficult, you're a very competent developer. And because of > that last reason, I have a hard time holding this ad-hominem > attack against you. I am dissapointed though.
He's probably confusing you from the real FUDers. I don't see you as a FUDer.
He's just resentful fighting with you over attention from the same batch of strippers at last years OLS. :)
bill
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |