[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
    Martin Hicks <> wrote:
    > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:54:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > >
    > > vm-early-zone-reclaim
    > >
    > > Needs some convincing benchmark numbers to back it up. Otherwise OK.
    > The only benchmarks I have for this were included in my last mail to
    > linux-mm:
    > Are they convincing? Well, the patch doesn't seem to make the memory
    > thrashing case much worse ("make -j" kernbench run) which is a good
    > thing since the VM is trying to reclaim much earlier.
    > In the same e-mail I mention that there is a fairly good performance
    > gain in the optimal case, where processes are tied to a single node and
    > the node's memory is filled with page cache. With zone reclaim turned
    > on the "make -j8" kernel build runs in 700 seconds; 735 seconds with
    > no reclaim.

    Ah, OK, I failed to capture that info. (I always have to move the info in
    the [patch 0/n] email into the first real patch, and this time I didn't)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-21 21:59    [W:0.020 / U:38.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site