[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [OT] mailing list management
    Stefan Smietanowski napisał(a):

    >>>These ideas make the mailing list resemble behavior of FidoNet echos and
    >>>GoldEd which were my first contact with e-mail conferences and I used to
    >>>like the way they worked. But that is completly different story.
    > You're also missing another point.
    > If someone sends a mail to the list without being subscribed to it,
    > and then you would write only to the list, the person asking the
    > original question wouldn't get the answer.

    Explicit CC request + self-CC the e-mail sent to the list in most cases
    will suffice. As far as TB is concerned this also needs 'Reply All' to
    be used but self-cc seems to me semantically more logical. Especially in
    the case Jasper has given when he sends a mail to LKML from a different
    place (work) than he receives it.

    > In a small, closed list reply-to: set to the list is good, but not on
    > an open list with people not subscribed answer.

    I may agree that.

    What I am really against is the dogmathic point of view presented in the
    document about RT header that is linked from the FAQ.

    Było mi bardzo miło. Trzecia pospolita klęska, [...]
    >Łukasz< Już nie katolicka lecz złodziejska. (c)PP

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-02 11:48    [W:0.040 / U:52.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site