[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Add some hooks to generic suspend code
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:21 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:

> >> Sure, ideally. However, existing X knows how to deal with APM events,
> >> and thus APM emulation is an important thing to get something that
> >> works. Pne thing I should do is consolidate PPC APM emu with ARM one as
> >> I think Russell improve my stuff significantly.
> >
> > Perhaps we need apm emulation on i386, too?
> No. This is too ugly for words IMO. If we have one good mechanism of
> notifying userland, X can use this mechanism. Let's kill APM, not keep
> it alive.

Euh... maybe but I still think we need to keep this userland interface
alive for a little while. At least ARM and PPC have existing stuff that
rely on it.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-03 00:23    [W:0.061 / U:16.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site