Messages in this thread | | | From | YhLu <> | Subject | RE: 2.6.12-rc5 is broken in nvidia Ck804 Opteron MB/with dual cor e dual way | Date | Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:55:19 -0700 |
| |
So core1 is not the sibling of core0?
YH
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@muc.de] > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:52 AM > To: YhLu > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc5 is broken in nvidia Ck804 Opteron > MB/with dual cor e dual way > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:26:00PM -0700, YhLu wrote: > > Brought up 4 CPUs > > CPU 0, cpu_sibling_map[0]= 1 > > CPU 0, cpu_core_map[0]= 3 > > CPU 1, cpu_sibling_map[1]= 2 > > CPU 1, cpu_core_map[1]= 3 > > CPU 2, cpu_sibling_map[2]= 4 > > CPU 2, cpu_core_map[2]= c > > CPU 3, cpu_sibling_map[3]= 8 > > CPU 3, cpu_core_map[3]= c > > are the cpu_sibling_map[] right? > > Yes it is correct. A CPU is always a sibling of itself. > > -Andi > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |