[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Add some hooks to generic suspend code
Pavel Machek wrote:

> Anyway, it should not be arch-dependend. We need one good mechanism of
> notifying userland, not one per architecture.


>> Sure, ideally. However, existing X knows how to deal with APM events,
>> and thus APM emulation is an important thing to get something that
>> works. Pne thing I should do is consolidate PPC APM emu with ARM one as
>> I think Russell improve my stuff significantly.
> Perhaps we need apm emulation on i386, too?

No. This is too ugly for words IMO. If we have one good mechanism of
notifying userland, X can use this mechanism. Let's kill APM, not keep
it alive.
Stefan Seyfried
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-02 18:27    [W:0.064 / U:7.912 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site