Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER breaks scheduler fairness | From | Steve Rotolo <> | Date | Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:48:46 -0400 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 09:34, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Funny you should mention this. Check the latest -mm code and you'll see Andrew > has merged my smp nice code which takes into account "nice" values and alters > balancing according to nice values and heavily biases them when real time > tasks are running. So you are correct, and it is a problem common to any > per-cpu runqueue designed scheduler (which interestingly there is evidence > that windows went to in about 2003 because it exhibited this very problem). > However my code should make this behave better now. >
Glad to hear this is in --mm! And BTW, your patch works great with my HT test case. Thanks -- good job.
-- Steve
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |