lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER breaks scheduler fairness
From
Date
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 09:34, Con Kolivas wrote:

> Funny you should mention this. Check the latest -mm code and you'll see Andrew
> has merged my smp nice code which takes into account "nice" values and alters
> balancing according to nice values and heavily biases them when real time
> tasks are running. So you are correct, and it is a problem common to any
> per-cpu runqueue designed scheduler (which interestingly there is evidence
> that windows went to in about 2003 because it exhibited this very problem).
> However my code should make this behave better now.
>

Glad to hear this is in --mm! And BTW, your patch works great with my
HT test case. Thanks -- good job.

--
Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-02 17:51    [W:0.078 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site