Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad? | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:10:01 -0400 |
| |
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:59 -0700, David L wrote: > I'm seeing the message: > > bad: scheduling while atomic! > > I see this dozens of times when I'm writing to a nand flash device using a > vendor-provided driver from Compulab in 2.6.8.1. Does this mean the driver > has a bug or is incompatible with the preemptive configuration option? How > bad is "bad"? Should I turn of the preemption option, ignore the message, > or what?
can you post the sourcecode of the driver? it needs fixing...
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |