Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:26:24 +0200 | From | Patrick Plattes <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] optimization for sys_semtimedop() (was: Opening Day for OpenSolaris) |
| |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:14:53AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Jim: From my understanding of the CDDL, only a file that "contains any > part of the Original Software" must be licensed under the CDDL, there > are no restrictions (except possibly patents, but I assume that even the > USPTO won't grant a patent on such a trivial idea) on using methods or > ideas from OpenSolaris in software that uses other licenses. > Is that correct?
Hello,
Patch: The patch looks fine and compiles clean.
CDDL: What is the definition of 'part'? IMHO we need a debate how to work with OpenSolaris ideas and the debate must me done by lawyers, not by kernel hacker.
Other: sem.c is hard to read - for me. Long functions and a lot of gotos confusing me. is this only my problem or is it really hard to understand?
cu pp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |