lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
From
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:18:06PM -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:04 am, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > Most people seem happy with 50 or so being a good limit even though many
> > systems support much longer.
>
> 50 characters or 50 bytes? Because in the case of UTF-8, if you do a lot of
> three byte characters (which require four bites to encode), 50 bytes is very
> short.

I would think most languages that need 2 or 3 bytes per character would
need a lot less characters, although I think I can think of a few cases
where that isn't true.

Well how about making it '50 characters seems plenty for most people to
be happy'. If you can handle a couple hundred bytes that should be ok,
and I think most filesystems can.

Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-17 14:59    [W:0.262 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site