[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
Subject2.6.12-rc6 missing commit(s) in cpufreq?

According to:

There should be a:

commit 1206aaac285904e3e3995eecbf4129b6555a8973
Author: Dave Jones <>
Date: Tue May 31 19:03:48 2005 -0700

[CPUFREQ] Allow ondemand stepping to be changed by user.

And when I look at:;a=commit;h=1206aaac285904e3e3995eecbf4129b6555a8973

There are changes in the diff like:

--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct dbs_tuners {
unsigned int up_threshold;
unsigned int down_threshold;
unsigned int ignore_nice;
+ unsigned int freq_step;

Problem is that neither a clean 2.6.11 patched with patch-2.6.12-rc6 nor
a full (I just downloaded it) contain that

The first example from above looks like:

struct dbs_tuners {
unsigned int sampling_rate;
unsigned int sampling_down_factor;
unsigned int up_threshold;
unsigned int ignore_nice;
Even more strange is the other discrepancies in that list, suggesting
other missed commits. Live directory from 2.6.12-rc :

root:sleipner:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand# ls
total 0
0 ignore_nice 0 sampling_rate 0 sampling_rate_min
0 sampling_down_factor 0 sampling_rate_max 0 up_threshold

Perhaps this is why I can't get the conservative governor to work at all
(it just sits at the freq at which it was loaded, never going up/down no
matter the load).

Mats Johannesson
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-17 12:25    [W:0.042 / U:46.928 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site