Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:51:52 -0700 | From | Chris Wedgwood <> | Subject | Re: [patch] inotify. |
| |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:07:38PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> in inotify is _very_ similar to how epoll is represented to user > space. Is there a good reason that epoll is a set of syscalls while > inotify is a character device, or is one of them simply wrong?
Tangentially inotify does some of what the DMAPI interface(s) want to do (albeit somewhat simpler). It would seem since DMAPI in it's current incarnation won't "go away and die[1]" it might be worth considering how much overlap there is.
[1] More than one fs has this out-of-tree and people are using it in various forms. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |