Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:43:51 +0800 | From | Coywolf Qi Hunt <> | Subject | Re: Why is one sync() not enough? |
| |
On 6/15/05, Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua> wrote: > On Wednesday 15 June 2005 11:17, Helge Hafting wrote: > > Nico Schottelius wrote: > > > > >Hello again! > > > > > >When my system shuts down and init calls sync() and after that > > >umount and then reboot, the filesystem is left in an unclean state. > > > > > >If I do sync() two times (one before umount, one after umount) it > > >seems to work. > > sync before umount is superfluous.
BTW, how about sysrq-s and sysrq-u? The same? -- Coywolf Qi Hunt http://ahbl.org/~coywolf/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |