Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls. | From | David Woodhouse <> | Date | Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:58:42 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:31 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > I don't see the need for higher precision in this API and a change is > confusing. There is nanosleep() for people who only want a delay and > that can be done with high precision.
If that's the case, might one enquire as to why pselect() has a struct timespec instead of a struct timeval?
Or would the answer just depress me? > -- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |