[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread

Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> OK. However, should the discussion get to the point where something
> like RTAI-Fusion has realtime versions of system calls that have
> globally-visible side-effects (such as I/O, networking, IPC, ...),
> then the issue of how to get the non-realtime and the realtime variants
> to play nicely with each other will arise.

Maybe so, but this will be a problem for the RT folks, not the
mainstream folks, and that's why I believe this strategy is
likely to be more feasible.

> I was responding to your list of combinations of CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, Adeos,
> and Fusion, assuming (probably incorrectly) that you and Kristian were
> looking to compare all the possible combinations. If my assumption is
> incorrect, then my question was irrelevant, and I apologize for the noise.

Sorry, there's only so much we can do. Currently, we are redoing
our earlier tests with what Ingo gave us.

Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits || || 1-866-677-4546
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-13 22:40    [W:0.116 / U:0.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site