[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: latency error (~2ms) with nanosleep
quade wrote:
> Playing around with the (simple) measurement of latency-times
> I noticed, that the systemcall "nanosleep" has always a minimal
> latency from about ~2ms (haven't run it all night, so...). It
> seems to be a systematical error.

Known issue. The x86 interrupt usually has a period of slightly less
than a ms. It will therefore generally add nearly a whole ms to ensure
that it does not ever wait for *less* than specified.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-13 18:53    [W:0.051 / U:4.824 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site