Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:38:40 -0700 | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Subject | Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls. |
| |
David Woodhouse wrote:
> Eep -- I hadn't noticed that difference. Will update patch accordingly.
And change it to expect a 64bit value I hope...
> The other documented difference (other than the signal mask bit) is that > pselect() is documented not to modify the timeout parameter. I'm not > sure whether I should preserve that difference, or not.
As long as there is a configuration where the timeout value is not modified, it doesn't matter. That is the case for select() using a personality switch.
-- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |