Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1 | From | Kristian Benoit <> | Date | Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:15:55 -0400 |
| |
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 02:15 -0700, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote: > Its a good start, and its excellent that its being looked at. Thank > you > guys very much for taking the time to compare these 2 very different > systems.
Youre welcome !
> I think the comparison should absolutely compare identical community > kernels. The comparison between two different release candidates is > questionable. rc2 to rc4 doesn't seem like much, after all, how much > code could go into a release candidate. (diff | wc -l)
I agree with that, but as the results show, there does'nt seems to be much difference impact the numbers in the tested field.
> Also, I question testing -rc code in the first place, except for > regression purposes.
I tested the -rc code in orther to be able to compare the patched kernels against theird own source.
> How does that effort compare for porting ADEOS code? If several weeks > of > work are invested in a comparison of rc2 to rc4, how much additional > work is needed to bring Adeos up to the base for the current RT > kernel?
Philippe, I think that question is youre !
Kristian
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |