lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: Is kernel 2.6.11 adjust tcp_max_syn_backlog incorrectly?
From
Date
Skywind <gnuwind@gmail.com> writes:
>
> It seems that kernel don't adjust these value automatic, is this a bug?
>
> I guess the mechanism of tcp.c in 2.6.11 have some changes(between
> 2.6.10), and it conduce to this result,
> Is this guess correctly?

Yes, there were some changes here when it was converted to a common
function for all hash tables (alloc_large_system_hash - the function
with the argument list from hell). Anyways, here's a quick fix.

DaveM for your consideration.

Adjust TCP mem order check to new alloc_large_system_hash

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

--- linux-2.6.11-work/net/ipv4/tcp.c~ 2005-03-02 08:37:51.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-work/net/ipv4/tcp.c 2005-06-11 12:16:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -2337,7 +2337,7 @@
(tcp_bhash_size * sizeof(struct tcp_bind_hashbucket));
order++)
;
- if (order > 4) {
+ if (order >= 4) {
sysctl_local_port_range[0] = 32768;
sysctl_local_port_range[1] = 61000;
sysctl_tcp_max_tw_buckets = 180000;


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-11 12:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans