Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 | Date | Sun, 12 Jun 2005 08:20:05 +1000 |
| |
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 06:13, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > --Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote (on Saturday, June 11, 2005 > > Great thanks. Here are rolled up all the reconsidered changes that apply > > directly to 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 -purely for testing purposes-. I'd be very > > grateful to see how this performed; it has been boot and stress tested at > > this end. If it shows detriment I'll have to make the smp nice changes > > more complex. > > It's much better ... but still a degredation - see point p5181 on: > > http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/abat/perf/kernbench.mo >e.png > > Only really seems to hurt the NUMA box (the x440 one ... elm3b67 ... is > still trying to find it's ass with both hands). I'm not necessarily saying > it's a problem ... not sure what the benefits of the patch are, but it's a > data point, at least ?
Thanks a lot!
Just checking the numbering of the test runs with you. This is the blue line order as plotted on the graph:
5181 is with this patch 4947 is mm1? 5150 is mm1 with the 4 patches backed out 5081 is mm1 with the 4 patches backed out and Hz changed to 100? 5169 is ?
Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |