Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:36:32 +0200 | From | Jan Kara <> | Subject | Re: Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() and the fix |
| |
Hello,
> This was brought up earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/6/30 > > Is there any reason for this one-liner to not go into mainline? It > appears to fix up a quite nasty failure. Even if it is not the real > correct long term solution it has to be better than having boxes > panic'ing under certain loads? Actually I just wanted to write Andrew to include the two one-liners that fix the real bugs (the patches will follow soon). I have the bigger patch splitting the checkpoint lists but that is certainly not a 2.6.12 thing. And this bigger patch needs the two one-line fixes anyway. I'll elaborate more in the mails with the patches...
Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> SuSE CR Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |