lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() and the fix
  Hello,

> This was brought up earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/6/30
>
> Is there any reason for this one-liner to not go into mainline? It
> appears to fix up a quite nasty failure. Even if it is not the real
> correct long term solution it has to be better than having boxes
> panic'ing under certain loads?
Actually I just wanted to write Andrew to include the two one-liners
that fix the real bugs (the patches will follow soon). I have the bigger
patch splitting the checkpoint lists but that is certainly not a 2.6.12
thing. And this bigger patch needs the two one-line fixes anyway.
I'll elaborate more in the mails with the patches...

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-01 09:39    [W:0.130 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site