lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:32:02PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
>>years of doing that in linux. I'm not a lawyer but you may want to
>>check before investing too much on this for the next 15 years. The
>
> Here's a link that may be of interest:
>
> http://www.fsmlabs.com/openpatentlicense.html
> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r=12&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ptxt&s1=5,995,745&OS=5,995,745&RS=5,995,745

Did you read this?

All the claims in the "Claims" section of the patent text start with:

> providing a real time operating system for running real time tasks and components and non-real time tasks;
>
> providing a general purpose operating system as one of the non-real time tasks;

This seems like the RTAI kind of nano-kernel approach and has nothing to
do with the way the RT-PREEMPT patch works, AFAICS.

--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be
made in a very narrow field.
Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-01 17:05    [W:1.406 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site