[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH][RFC][0/4] InfiniBand userspace verbs implementation
    On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:27:21PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > On Wed, 4 May 2005, William Jordan wrote:
    > > On 5/3/05, Andy Isaacson <> wrote:
    > > > Rather than replacing the fully-registered pages with pages of zeros,
    > > > you could simply unmap them.
    > >
    > > I don't like this option. It is nearly free to map all of the pages to
    > > the zero-page. You never have to allocate a page if the user never
    > > writes to it.
    > Unmapping should work fine, as long as the VMA flags are
    > set appropriately. The page fault handler can take care
    > of the rest...

    I think there may be a difference in terminology here. What I
    originally proposed (and what I think Bill was reacting to) is the
    equivalent of sys_munmap() on the range of registered pages. That has
    the downsides that he mentioned; an address that was valid in the parent
    will now result in SIGSEGV or SIGBUS in the child, and it's explicitly
    endorsed by the userland APIs (such as MPI2) that it's valid to register
    stack addresses (for example).

    What I think you're proposing, Rik, is that VMA get destroyed (or split,
    if only part of it had been registered) and replaced with an anonymous
    one. That's a very low-overhead way of going about it, I think. Then
    as you say, the page fault handler will automatically give a zero page
    to the process when it faults on those addresses.

    Did I understand your suggestion correctly? I think I agree with
    Bill that having the child fault on pages which happened to have been
    registered by the parent would be a bad thing.

    This would, if I understand correctly, be visible in /proc/$$/maps.
    Which is OK, if a little bit suprising; but the alternatives are worse.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-05 04:00    [W:0.021 / U:80.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site