Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 May 2005 19:49:39 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: RT patch acceptance |
| |
kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
> When I was told to analyze whether linux is suitable for our > needs, any nanokernel or two-OS approaches were excluded from the > beginning: Mgmt thought that due to their nature and complexity, > such approaches are not able to offer any improvements w.r.t. what > we have now. Clearly, "one system and one source" is wanted! >
You don't explain how making the Linux kernel hard-RT will be so much simpler and more supportable! Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |