lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance
From
Date
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 19:15 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Sure, but like Andi said, general increased responsiveness is not exclusive
> to PREEMPT_RT, and any effort to reduce latency is welcome.

Nobody denies that, but thats no argument against a RT extension.

> But wasn't the same said about the existing preemption code? Yet, most
> distros ship with it disabled and some developers still feel that there
> are no added benefits.

One of the most disgusting arguments in this thread is "distros do XYZ".

There is a lot of Linux beyond distros.

tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-31 02:20    [W:0.085 / U:2.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site