Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: RT patch acceptance | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Date | Tue, 31 May 2005 02:07:25 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 19:15 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > Sure, but like Andi said, general increased responsiveness is not exclusive > to PREEMPT_RT, and any effort to reduce latency is welcome.
Nobody denies that, but thats no argument against a RT extension.
> But wasn't the same said about the existing preemption code? Yet, most > distros ship with it disabled and some developers still feel that there > are no added benefits.
One of the most disgusting arguments in this thread is "distros do XYZ".
There is a lot of Linux beyond distros.
tglx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |