[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2005 11:49:32 EDT, Bill Davidsen said:
>>Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>>On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>>+#!/usr/bin/env python
>>> #
>>> # mercurial - a minimal scalable distributed SCM
>>> # v0.4b "oedipa maas"
>>Could you explain why this is necessary or desirable? I looked at what
>>env does, and I am missing the point of duplicating bash normal
>>behaviour regarding definition of per-process environment entries.
> Most likely, his python lives elsewhere than /usr/bin, and the 'env' call
> results in causing a walk across $PATH to find it....

Assuming that he has env in a standard place... I hope this isn't going
to start some rash of efforts to make packages run on non-standard
toolchains, which add requirements for one tool to get around
misplacement of another.

-bill davidsen (
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-03 22:00    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean