[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark wrote:
    > On Mon, 02 May 2005 11:49:32 EDT, Bill Davidsen said:
    >>Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    >>>On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:
    >>>+#!/usr/bin/env python
    >>> #
    >>> # mercurial - a minimal scalable distributed SCM
    >>> # v0.4b "oedipa maas"
    >>Could you explain why this is necessary or desirable? I looked at what
    >>env does, and I am missing the point of duplicating bash normal
    >>behaviour regarding definition of per-process environment entries.
    > Most likely, his python lives elsewhere than /usr/bin, and the 'env' call
    > results in causing a walk across $PATH to find it....

    Assuming that he has env in a standard place... I hope this isn't going
    to start some rash of efforts to make packages run on non-standard
    toolchains, which add requirements for one tool to get around
    misplacement of another.

    -bill davidsen (
    "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
    last possible moment - but no longer" -me

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-03 22:00    [W:0.020 / U:27.672 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site