lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance

    * Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:

    > But at least CONFIG_PREEMPT is still reasonably cheap, so it is not as
    > intrusive as some of the stuff proposed.

    actually, PREEMPT_RT is not nearly as intrusive (on the source level) as
    PREEMPT. It's not even in the same ballpark. (because it mostly rides on
    the top of the intrusion caused by SMP and PREEMPT support.)

    it's intrusive in terms of performance impact.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-27 15:40    [W:0.032 / U:33.320 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site