[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance

* Andi Kleen <> wrote:

> But at least CONFIG_PREEMPT is still reasonably cheap, so it is not as
> intrusive as some of the stuff proposed.

actually, PREEMPT_RT is not nearly as intrusive (on the source level) as
PREEMPT. It's not even in the same ballpark. (because it mostly rides on
the top of the intrusion caused by SMP and PREEMPT support.)

it's intrusive in terms of performance impact.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-27 15:40    [W:0.131 / U:13.036 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site