lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: RT patch acceptance
From
Date
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 13:52 -0700, Bill Huey wrote:

Sorry for the empty reply.

I was putting a hotdog under the saw to see if it would stop.

> > If you drop irq threads then you cannot convert all locks
> > anymore or have to add ugly in_interrupt()checks. So any conversion like
> > that requires converting locks.
>
> That's reversed. Interrupt threads are an isolated change itself and can
> be submitted upstream if so desired with no associated lock changes.



Precisely what was stated in the first place.

> bill
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-26 23:23    [W:0.184 / U:6.296 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site