Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Sun, 22 May 2005 16:31:13 -0400 |
| |
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:58 +0200, Brian O'Mahoney wrote: > There is NO Question(TM), the DPA is about the privacy, appropriateness, > accuracy of private data and the way that data can be used by government > or industry, and I can see no reason why anyone should remove > 'sign-offs' or other identification in the original e-mail which forms > part of the original communication, if legal advice was received to > the contrary it is _plain_wrong_; (for example we could not store e-mail > sent to us, which is often mandatory to the proper conduct of business). > > Copyright law is complicated, since it differs in the UK, EU and non EU > contries, such as Switzerland; so in the UK copyright automatically > persists in anything I write, in the US it dosn't, BUT, if a Bern > Convention copyright notice is included, eg: >
Are you a lawyer? I think "copyright automatically persists in anything you write" in the US as well.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |