Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Mon, 02 May 2005 12:14:56 -0400 |
| |
On Mon, 02 May 2005 11:49:32 EDT, Bill Davidsen said: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > -#!/usr/bin/python > > +#!/usr/bin/env python > > # > > # mercurial - a minimal scalable distributed SCM > > # v0.4b "oedipa maas" > > Could you explain why this is necessary or desirable? I looked at what > env does, and I am missing the point of duplicating bash normal > behaviour regarding definition of per-process environment entries.
Most likely, his python lives elsewhere than /usr/bin, and the 'env' call results in causing a walk across $PATH to find it.... [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |