[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Factor in buddy allocator alignment requirements in node memory alignment
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 12:43 -0700, christoph wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2005, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 12:05 -0700, christoph wrote:
> > > Memory for nodes on i386 is currently aligned on 2 MB boundaries.
> > > However, the buddy allocator needs pages to be aligned on
> > > PAGE_SIZE << MAX_ORDER which is 8MB if MAX_ORDER = 11.
> >
> > Why do you need this? Are you planning on allowing NUMA KVA remap pages
> > to be handed over to the buddy allocator? That would be a major
> > departure from what we do now, and I'd be very interested in seeing how
> > that is implemented before a infrastructure for it goes in.
> Because the buddy allocator is complaining about wrongly allocated zones!

Just because it complains doesn't mean that anything is actually
wrong :)

Do you know which pieces of code actually break if the alignment doesn't
meet what that warning says?

-- Dave

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-16 22:50    [W:0.079 / U:3.140 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site