[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Sync option destroys flash!
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 12:20 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Under the right circumstances, even copying a single file to a flash
> drive mounted with the "sync" option can destroy the entire drive!
> Now that I have your attention!
> I found this out the hard way. (Kissed one brand new $70 USD 1GB flash
> drive good-bye.) According to the man pages for mount, FAT and VFAT
> file systems ignore the "sync" option. It lies.

I guess you found out the hard way that the vast majority of Linux docs
are 2-3 years out of date...

> On a real hard
> drive, this will cause "head resonances" as the heads go through
> constant high speed seeks between the cylinder with the FAT tables and
> the data cylinders. That can't be good, on a continuous basis, for
> drive life. But it's really a disaster for flash memory.

I have seen a clueless sysadmin destroy several 15,000 RPM SCSI drives
this way by putting the syslog partition and mail spool at opposite ends
of the drive. I think Alan Cox said something like "these days you can
no longer assume that buggy software won't destroy your hardware".


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-13 23:31    [W:0.196 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site