[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [rfc/patch] libata -- port configurable delays
    On Gwe, 2005-05-13 at 19:58, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
    > is available at
    > Before this patch __delay() is the number one entry in oprofile
    > results for this workload. Does this look like a reasonable approach
    > for chipsets that aren't completely braindead? Cheers,

    If your chipset implements the 400nS lockout in hardware it certainly
    seems to make sense. Nice to know someone has put it in hardware

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-13 23:29    [W:0.022 / U:7.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site