[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc/patch] libata -- port configurable delays
On Gwe, 2005-05-13 at 19:58, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> is available at
> Before this patch __delay() is the number one entry in oprofile
> results for this workload. Does this look like a reasonable approach
> for chipsets that aren't completely braindead? Cheers,

If your chipset implements the 400nS lockout in hardware it certainly
seems to make sense. Nice to know someone has put it in hardware

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-13 23:29    [W:0.071 / U:12.548 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site