[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RCF] [PATCH] unprivileged mount/umount
Quoting Jamie Lokier (
> wrote:
> > Right, sys_unshare(), as per Janak's patch. Does it lack anything which
> > you would need?
> For creating new namespaces to be held by a daemon for handing out to
> user processes on demand, it's no more convenient than clone().

I see.

My use for namespaces is to simply customize the fs view on login, so
sys_unshare is more convenient than clone because it now allows a pam
library to switch namespaces, which was either impossible or hard to do
using clone. Making namespaces first-class objects should also work,
since the namespaces can just be set up in advance and then entered from
inside a pam library.

Still I'd agree with Eric. It'd be good to see just how much we can do
with the ability to clone a namespace outside of clone(). Going back to
the daemon handing out namespaces... why can't you just take your
earlier example of /var/namespaces/NS1, etc, where you just create a
bunch of fs trees under the /var/namespaces directory using bind mounts,
and then login or pam does

pivot_root(/var/namespaces/NS3, tmp)
umount(tmp, MNT_DETACH)
chroot .

No daemon needed...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-12 05:11    [W:0.057 / U:10.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site