Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sync_sb_inodes cleanup | From | Robert Love <> | Date | Wed, 11 May 2005 13:49:24 -0400 |
| |
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 11:37 +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
> I did not want to un-const start. It would be required for the > assignment move, wouldn't it?
Well, the const is just a programming convention. It is useful here, but just a convention; removing it changes nothing behavior-wise. Your patch, though, changes behavior.
How bad do you need to push the spin locks into the function?
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |