[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Fwd: Re: connector is missing in 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
    On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

    > > > Sure, but seems I need to ask again: What is the exact reason not to implement
    > > > the muticast message multiplexing/subscription part of the connector as a
    > > > generic part of netlink? That would be nice to have and useful for other
    > > > subsystems too as an option to the current broadcast.
    > >
    > > This is a good point, in general, consider generically extending Netlink
    > > itself instead of creating these separate things.

    > Connector requires it's own registration technique for
    > 1. hide all transport [netlink] layer from higher protocols which use
    > connector


    > 2. create different group appointment for the given connector's ID
    > [it was different, now new group which is eqal to idx field is appointed
    > to
    > the new callback]

    I don't understand.

    > 3. provide more generic set of ids

    What do you mean by "ids"?

    - James
    James Morris

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-08 07:59    [W:0.019 / U:90.668 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site