[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Fwd: Re: connector is missing in 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

> > > Sure, but seems I need to ask again: What is the exact reason not to implement
> > > the muticast message multiplexing/subscription part of the connector as a
> > > generic part of netlink? That would be nice to have and useful for other
> > > subsystems too as an option to the current broadcast.
> >
> > This is a good point, in general, consider generically extending Netlink
> > itself instead of creating these separate things.

> Connector requires it's own registration technique for
> 1. hide all transport [netlink] layer from higher protocols which use
> connector


> 2. create different group appointment for the given connector's ID
> [it was different, now new group which is eqal to idx field is appointed
> to
> the new callback]

I don't understand.

> 3. provide more generic set of ids

What do you mean by "ids"?

- James
James Morris

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-08 07:59    [W:0.127 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site