lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Kernel SCM saga..
    David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
    >
    > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 01:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > (I don't do that for -mm because -mm basically doesn't work for 99% of
    > > the time. Takes 4-5 hours to out a release out assuming that
    > > nothing's busted, and usually something is).
    >
    > On the subject of -mm: are you going to keep doing the BK imports to
    > that for the time being, or would it be better to leave the BK trees
    > alone now and send you individual patches.

    I really don't know - I'll continue to pull the bk trees for a while, until
    we work out what the new (probably interim) regime looks like.

    > For that matter, will there be a brief amnesty after 2.6.12 where Linus
    > will use BK to pull those trees which were waiting for that, or will we
    > all need to export from BK manually?
    >

    I think Linus has stopped using bk already.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-07 11:55    [W:0.023 / U:61.920 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site