lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [Fwd: Re: connector is missing in 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:50 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
    > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:52:34AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
    > > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:32 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
    > > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:33:58AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
    > > > > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:59 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
    > > > > > Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > atomic_dec_and_test() is more expensive than 2 barriers + atomic_dec(),
    > > > > > > but in case of connector I think the price is not so high.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Can you list the platforms on which this is true?
    > > > >
    > > > > sparc64, some mips [at least in UP].
    > > >
    > > > Are you sure? The implementations of atomic_sub and atomic_sub_return
    > > > (which correspond to atomic_dec and atomic_dec_and_test) seem to be
    > > > comparable in cost on those two architectures.
    > >
    > > mips has additional sync.
    >
    > But atomic_dec + 2 barries is going to do the sync as well, no?

    On UP do not.

    > Cheers,
    --
    Evgeniy Polyakov

    Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-08 06:05    [W:0.025 / U:3.988 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site