[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Kernel SCM saga..
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 16:51 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Linus,
> > That "individual patches" is one of the keywords, btw. One thing that BK
> > has been extremely good at, and that a lot of people have come to like
> > even when they didn't use BK, is how we've been maintaining a much finer-
> > granularity view of changes. That isn't going to go away.
> Are you happy with processing patches + descriptions, one per mail?
> Do you have it automated to the point where processing emailed patches
> involves little more overhead than doing a bk pull? If so, then your
> mailbox (or patch queue) becomes a natural serialization point for the
> changes, and the need for a tool that can handle a complex graph of
> changes is much reduced.

alternatively you could send an mbox with your series in... that has a
natural sequence in it ;)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-07 09:54    [W:0.340 / U:3.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site