[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ds1337 1/4
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:17:58AM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:18:39PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Jean's point is that you should send an individual patch for each type
> > of individual change. It's ok to say "patch 3 requires you to have
> > applied patches 1 and 2" and so on. Please split this up better.
> Here it is...
> Use i2c_transfer to send message, so we get proper bus locking.

Oops, you forgot to add a Signed-off-by: line for every patch, as per
Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Care to redo them?


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-08 02:18    [W:0.096 / U:8.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site