[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Kernel SCM saga..
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 20:04 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Thu, 7 April 2005 10:47:18 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > > No. There's another reason - when you are cherry-picking and reordering
> > > *your* *own* *patches*.
> >
> > Yes. I agree. There should be some support for cherry-picking in between a
> > temporary throw-away tree and a "cleaned-up-tree". However, it should be
> > something you really do need to think about, and in most cases it really
> > does boil down to "export as patch, re-import from patch". Especially
> > since you potentially want to edit things in between anyway when you
> > cherry-pick.
> For reordering, using patcher, you can simply edit the sequence file
> and move lines around. Nice and simple interface.
> There is no checking involved, though. If you mode dependent patches,
> you end up with a mess and either throw it all away or seriously
> scratch your head. So a serious SCM might do something like this:

just fyi, patchutils has a tool that can "flip" the order of patches
even if they patch the same line of code in the files.... with it you
can make a "bubble sort" to move stuff about safely...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-07 22:59    [W:0.121 / U:4.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site